A cross-national comparison of income gradients in oral health quality of life in four welfare states: application of the Korpi and Palme typology.
AuthorsSanders, A E
Slade, G D
John, M T
Steele, J G
Suominen-Taipale, A L
Nuttall, N M
Allen, P Finbarr
AffiliationThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, NC 27599, USA. email@example.com
Attitude to Health
Health Status Disparities
Quality of Life
MetadataShow full item record
CitationA cross-national comparison of income gradients in oral health quality of life in four welfare states: application of the Korpi and Palme typology. 2009, 63 (7):569-74 J Epidemiol Community Health
JournalJournal of epidemiology and community health
AbstractThe extent to which welfare states may influence health outcomes has not been explored. It was hypothesised that policies which target the poor are associated with greater income inequality in oral health quality of life than those that provide earnings-related benefits to all citizens.
Data were from nationally representative surveys in the UK (n = 4064), Finland (n = 5078), Germany (n = 1454) and Australia (n = 2292) conducted from 1998 to 2002. The typology of Korpi and Palme classifies these countries into four different welfare states. In each survey, subjects completed the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire, which evaluates the adverse consequence of dental conditions on quality of life. For each country, survey estimation commands were used to create linear regression models that estimated the slope of the gradient between four quartiles of income and OHIP-14 severity scores. Parameter estimates for income gradients were contrasted across countries using Wald chi(2) tests specifying a critical p value of 0.008, equivalent to a Bonferroni correction of p<0.05 for the six pairwise tests.
Statistically significant income gradients in OHIP-14 severity scores were found in all countries except Germany. A global test confirmed significant cross-national differences in the magnitude of income gradients. In Australia, where a flat rate of benefits targeted the poor, the mean OHIP-14 severity score reduced by 1.7 units (95% CI -2.15 to -1.34) with each increasing quartile of household income, a significantly steeper gradient than in other countries.
The coverage and generosity of welfare state benefits appear to influence levels of inequality in population oral health quality of life.
- Impact of oral disease on quality of life in the US and Australian populations.
- Authors: Sanders AE, Slade GD, Lim S, Reisine ST
- Issue date: 2009 Apr
- Evaluating the role of dental behaviour in oral health inequalities.
- Authors: Sanders AE, Spencer AJ, Slade GD
- Issue date: 2006 Feb
- Inequalities in oral impacts and welfare regimes: analysis of 21 European countries.
- Authors: Guarnizo-Herreño CC, Watt RG, Pikhart H, Sheiham A, Tsakos G
- Issue date: 2014 Dec
- Measuring and decomposing oral health inequalities in an UK population.
- Authors: Shen J, Wildman J, Steele J
- Issue date: 2013 Dec
- Inequality in oral health-related quality of life before and after a major subsidization reform.
- Authors: Raittio E, Lahti S, Kiiskinen U, Helminen S, Aromaa A, Suominen AL
- Issue date: 2015 Aug