Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKartalova-O'Doherty, Yulia
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, Donna Tedstone
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-15T11:02:42Z
dc.date.available2010-06-15T11:02:42Z
dc.date.issued2008-03
dc.identifier.citationCoping strategies and styles of family carers of persons with enduring mental illness: a mixed methods analysis. 2008, 22 (1):19-28 Scand J Caring Scien
dc.identifier.issn0283-9318
dc.identifier.pmid18269419
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00583.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/104862
dc.description.abstractA qualitative exploratory study investigated the experiences and needs of family carers of persons with enduring mental illness in Ireland. The current mixed-methods secondary study used content analysis and statistical procedures to identify and explore the coping strategies emerging from the original interviews. The majority of family carers reported use of active behavioural coping strategies, sometimes combined with active cognitive or avoidance strategies. The percentage of cares reporting use of active cognitive strategies was the lowest among those whose ill relative lived in their home, and the highest among those whose relative lived independently. Participants with identified active cognitive strategies often reported that their relative was employed or in training. Participants who reported use of avoidance strategies were significantly younger than participants who did not report use of such strategies. The lowest percentage of avoidance strategies was among participants whose ill relative lived independently, whereas the highest was among carers whose relative lived in their home. The findings of this study highlight the importance of a contextual approach to studying coping styles and processes. Further research questions and methodological implications are discussed.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherHealth Research Board (HRB)en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2846687/?tool=pubmeden
dc.subjectMENTAL AND BEHAVIOURAL DISORDERen
dc.subjectCARERen
dc.subject.meshAdaptation, Psychological
dc.subject.meshAdult
dc.subject.meshAged
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over
dc.subject.meshAttitude to Health
dc.subject.meshAvoidance Learning
dc.subject.meshCaregivers
dc.subject.meshCost of Illness
dc.subject.meshData Interpretation, Statistical
dc.subject.meshFamily
dc.subject.meshFemale
dc.subject.meshHome Nursing
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshIreland
dc.subject.meshMale
dc.subject.meshMental Disorders
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged
dc.subject.meshNursing Methodology Research
dc.subject.meshQualitative Research
dc.subject.meshQuestionnaires
dc.subject.meshResearch Design
dc.subject.meshSelf Care
dc.subject.meshStress, Psychological
dc.subject.otherIrelanden
dc.subject.otherMental illnessen
dc.titleCoping strategies and styles of family carers of persons with enduring mental illness: a mixed methods analysis.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Research Board (HRB)en
dc.identifier.journalScandinavian journal of caring sciencesen
html.description.abstractA qualitative exploratory study investigated the experiences and needs of family carers of persons with enduring mental illness in Ireland. The current mixed-methods secondary study used content analysis and statistical procedures to identify and explore the coping strategies emerging from the original interviews. The majority of family carers reported use of active behavioural coping strategies, sometimes combined with active cognitive or avoidance strategies. The percentage of cares reporting use of active cognitive strategies was the lowest among those whose ill relative lived in their home, and the highest among those whose relative lived independently. Participants with identified active cognitive strategies often reported that their relative was employed or in training. Participants who reported use of avoidance strategies were significantly younger than participants who did not report use of such strategies. The lowest percentage of avoidance strategies was among participants whose ill relative lived independently, whereas the highest was among carers whose relative lived in their home. The findings of this study highlight the importance of a contextual approach to studying coping styles and processes. Further research questions and methodological implications are discussed.


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record