Thumbnail Image
Publication

Inter-Reader Reliability of Early FDG-PET/CT Response Assessment Using the Deauville Scale after 2 Cycles of Intensive Chemotherapy (OEPA) in Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Kluge, Regine
; 
Chavdarova, Lidia
; 
Hoffmann, Martha
; 
Kobe, Carsten
; 
Malkowski, Bogdan
; 
Montravers, Françoise
; 
Kurch, Lars
; 
Georgi, Thomas
; 
Dietlein, Markus
; 
Wallace, W Hamish
... show 9 more
Authors
Kluge, Regine
 Chavdarova, Lidia
 Hoffmann, Martha
 Kobe, Carsten
 Malkowski, Bogdan
 Montravers, Françoise
 Kurch, Lars
 Georgi, Thomas
 Dietlein, Markus
 Wallace, W Hamish
 Karlen, Jonas
 Fernández-Teijeiro, Ana
 Cepelova, Michaela
 Wilson, Lorrain
 Bergstraesser, Eva
 Sabri, Osama
 Mauz-Körholz, Christine
 Körholz, Dieter
 Hasenclever, Dirk
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
Departments
Date
2016
Date Submitted
Keywords
HODGKIN LYMPHOMA
ASSESSMENT SCALES
Other Subjects
Subject Mesh
Adolescent
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Child
Child, Preschool
Doxorubicin
Etoposide
Female
Glucose-6-Phosphate
Hodgkin Disease
Humans
Male
Positron-Emission Tomography
Prednisone
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Vincristine
Planned Date
Start Date
Collaborators
Principal Investigators
Files
Thumbnail Image
OA Article
Adobe PDF, 625 KB
Alternative Titles
Publisher
PLoS One
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10147/619118
Abstract
The five point Deauville (D) scale is widely used to assess interim PET metabolic response to chemotherapy in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients. An International Validation Study reported good concordance among reviewers in ABVD treated advanced stage HL patients for the binary discrimination between score D1,2,3 and score D4,5. Inter-reader reliability of the whole scale is not well characterised.
Language
en
Citation
Inter-Reader Reliability of Early FDG-PET/CT Response Assessment Using the Deauville Scale after 2 Cycles of Intensive Chemotherapy (OEPA) in Hodgkin's Lymphoma. 2016, 11 (3):e0149072 PLoS ONE
ISSN
1932-6203
eISSN
ISBN
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0149072
PMID
26963909
PMCID
Sponsorships
Funding Sources
Funding Amounts
Grant Identifiers
Methodology
Duration
Ethical Approval