Doctors' handovers in hospitals: a literature review
Raduma-Tomas, M. A. Flin, R. Yule, S. Williams, D.
Raduma-Tomas, M. A.
Flin, R.
Yule, S.
Williams, D.
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
Departments
Date
2011
Date Submitted
Keywords
Other Subjects
Subject Mesh
Planned Date
Start Date
Collaborators
Principal Investigators
Alternative Titles
Publisher
Abstract
Aim To review studies on hospital doctors' handovers to identify the methods and main findings. Method A literature search of electronic databases Medline and Embase (via Ovid) was conducted against a set of inclusion criteria. Results A total of 32 papers were identified. The most common methods of studying handovers were observations and interviews, which typically focused on the sign-out (ie, handover meeting). This is just one stage of the handover process: pre- and posthandover phases were rarely examined. Although providing useful descriptive information, the studies rarely evaluated the quality of handover practices. While communication is generally recognised as the critical component, there has been little training of this skill. Conclusion The handover literature does not fully identify where communication failures typically occur or influencing conditions, thus hampering the design of effective handover training and tools. A systematic analysis of all the stages of doctors' handovers is required.
Language
en
ISSN
2044-5415
2044-5423
2044-5423
eISSN
ISBN
DOI
10.1136/bmjqs.2009.034389