Loading...
Measuring clinical outcomes in adult ADHD clinics: psychometrics of a new scale, the adult ADHD Clinical Outcome Scale.
Adamis, Dimitrios Singh, Jasmin Coada, Iulian Wrigley, Margo Gavin, Blánaid McNicholas, Fiona
Adamis, Dimitrios
Singh, Jasmin
Coada, Iulian
Wrigley, Margo
Gavin, Blánaid
McNicholas, Fiona
Advisors
Editors
Other Contributors
Departments
Date
2024-10-14
Date Submitted
Keywords
ADHD Clinical Outcome Scale
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
adults
psychometrics
routine clinical outcome monitoring
Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
adults
psychometrics
routine clinical outcome monitoring
Other Subjects
Subject Mesh
Planned Date
Start Date
Collaborators
Principal Investigators
Files
Alternative Titles
Publisher
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) clinics are in their infancy in Ireland and internationally. There is an urgent need for clinical evaluation of these services. Until now, clinical outcomes have relied mainly on functional scales and/or quality of life. However, adult ADHD is a longstanding disorder with many comorbidities. Although medication for ADHD symptoms can have immediate effects, co-occurring problems may take considerably longer to remediate.
AIMS: To present the psychometrics of a short outcome measure of key clinical areas including symptoms.
METHOD: The ADHD Clinical Outcome Scale (ACOS), developed by the authors, is a clinician-rated scale and was administered in consecutive adults attending an ADHD clinic. A modified version was completed by the participant. A second clinician independently administered the scale in a subsample. ACOS consists of 15 items rated on a Likert scale. Two self-report scales, the Adult ADHD Quality of Life Questionnaire (AAQoL) and Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale (WFIRS), were also administered.
RESULTS: The mean age of 148 participants was 30.1 years (s.d. = 9.71), and 81 were female (54.7%). The correlation for interrater reliability was = 0.868, and that between the participant and clinician versions was = 0.663. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the internal consistency was 0.829, and the correlations for concurrent validity with total AAQoL and WFIRS scores were = -0.573 and = 0.477, respectively. Factor analysis revealed four factors: (a) attentional/organisational problems; (b) hyperactivity/impulsivity; (c) comorbidities; and (d) alcohol/drug use, self-harm and tension in relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: The psychometrics of the ACOS are promising, and the inclusion of typically co-occurring clinical domains makes it suitable for use as a clinician-rated outcome measure in every contact with patients attending adult ADHD clinics.
Language
en
Citation
ISSN
2056-4724
eISSN
ISBN
DOI
10.1192/bjo.2024.739
PMID
39397668