Comparison of acetabular reamings during hip resurfacing versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/94742
Title:
Comparison of acetabular reamings during hip resurfacing versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty.
Authors:
Brennan, S A; Harty, J A; Gormley, C; O'Rourke, S K
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopaedics, Cappagh Hospital, Finglas, Dublin, Ireland. stevobrennan@hotmail.com
Citation:
Comparison of acetabular reamings during hip resurfacing versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty. 2009, 17 (1):42-6 J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)
Journal:
Journal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)
Issue Date:
Apr-2009
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/94742
PubMed ID:
19398792
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To compare the quantity of bone removed from the acetabulum during resurfacing hip arthroplasty versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: 62 consecutive patients with osteoarthritis of the hip were prospectively studied. 24 men and 7 women aged 40 to 86 (mean, 59) years underwent Birmingham hip resurfacing. 13 men and 18 women aged 34 to 88 (mean, 61) years underwent uncemented THA using the trident acetabular cup. Obese elderly women at risk of femoral neck fracture and patients with large subchondral pseudocysts or a history of avascular necrosis of the femoral head were assigned to uncemented THA. Acetabular reamings were collected; marginal osteophytes were not included. The reamings were dehydrated, defatted, and weighed. RESULTS: The mean weight of acetabular reamings was not significantly different between patients undergoing hip resurfacing and uncemented THA (p=0.57). CONCLUSION: In hip resurfacing, the use of an appropriately small femoral component avoids oversizing the acetabular component and removal of excessive bone stock.
Language:
en
MeSH:
Acetabulum; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Cementation; Female; Femur Head; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Treatment Outcome
ISSN:
1022-5536

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, S Aen
dc.contributor.authorHarty, J Aen
dc.contributor.authorGormley, Cen
dc.contributor.authorO'Rourke, S Ken
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-23T16:36:00Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-23T16:36:00Z-
dc.date.issued2009-04-
dc.identifier.citationComparison of acetabular reamings during hip resurfacing versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty. 2009, 17 (1):42-6 J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)en
dc.identifier.issn1022-5536-
dc.identifier.pmid19398792-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/94742-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To compare the quantity of bone removed from the acetabulum during resurfacing hip arthroplasty versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: 62 consecutive patients with osteoarthritis of the hip were prospectively studied. 24 men and 7 women aged 40 to 86 (mean, 59) years underwent Birmingham hip resurfacing. 13 men and 18 women aged 34 to 88 (mean, 61) years underwent uncemented THA using the trident acetabular cup. Obese elderly women at risk of femoral neck fracture and patients with large subchondral pseudocysts or a history of avascular necrosis of the femoral head were assigned to uncemented THA. Acetabular reamings were collected; marginal osteophytes were not included. The reamings were dehydrated, defatted, and weighed. RESULTS: The mean weight of acetabular reamings was not significantly different between patients undergoing hip resurfacing and uncemented THA (p=0.57). CONCLUSION: In hip resurfacing, the use of an appropriately small femoral component avoids oversizing the acetabular component and removal of excessive bone stock.-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshAcetabulum-
dc.subject.meshAdult-
dc.subject.meshAged-
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.meshArthroplasty, Replacement, Hip-
dc.subject.meshCementation-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshFemur Head-
dc.subject.meshHip Prosthesis-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.meshOsteoarthritis, Hip-
dc.subject.meshProspective Studies-
dc.subject.meshProsthesis Design-
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleComparison of acetabular reamings during hip resurfacing versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty.en
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Orthopaedics, Cappagh Hospital, Finglas, Dublin, Ireland. stevobrennan@hotmail.comen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)en
dc.description.provinceLeinster-

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.