Research activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/94738
Title:
Research activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey.
Authors:
Glynn, Liam G; O'Riordan, Ciara; MacFarlane, Anne; Newell, John; Iglesias, Alberto A; Whitford, David; Cantillon, Peter; Murphy, Andrew W
Affiliation:
Department of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. liam.glynn@nuigalway.ie
Citation:
Research activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey. 2009, 10:33 BMC Fam Pract
Journal:
BMC family practice
Issue Date:
2009
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/94738
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2296-10-33
PubMed ID:
19432990
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Despite increased investment in primary care research and development (R&D), the level of engagement of primary healthcare professionals with research remains poor. The aim of this study is to assess the level of research activity and capacity for research among primary healthcare professionals in a health authority of over one million people in a mixed urban/rural setting in the West of Ireland. METHODS: A questionnaire, incorporating the R+D Culture Index, was sent to primary healthcare professionals in the HSE Western Region. Baseline characteristics were analysed with the use of one-way ANOVA and Chi-square test and the dependence of R&D Culture Index score on all sixteen available covariates was examined using multiple regression and regression tree modelling. RESULTS: There was a 54% response rate to the questionnaire. Primary healthcare professionals appeared to have an interest in and awareness of the importance of research in primary care but just 15% were found to be research active in this study. A more positive attitude towards an R&D culture was associated with having had previous research training, being currently involved in research and with not being a general practitioner (GP) (p < 0.001), but much variability in the R&D culture index score remained unexplained. CONCLUSION: Despite awareness of the importance of R&D in primary care and investment therein, primary healthcare professionals remain largely unengaged with the R&D process. This study highlights the issues that need to be addressed in order to encourage a shift towards a culture of R&D in primary care: lack of research training particularly in basic research skills and increased opportunities for research involvement. The use of the R&D Culture Index may enable groups to be identified that may be more research interested and can therefore be targeted in any future R&D strategy.
Language:
en
MeSH:
Adult; Analysis of Variance; Attitude of Health Personnel; Data Collection; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Health Personnel; Health Services Research; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Primary Health Care; Research
ISSN:
1471-2296

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorGlynn, Liam Gen
dc.contributor.authorO'Riordan, Ciaraen
dc.contributor.authorMacFarlane, Anneen
dc.contributor.authorNewell, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorIglesias, Alberto Aen
dc.contributor.authorWhitford, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorCantillon, Peteren
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Andrew Wen
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-23T16:32:51Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-23T16:32:51Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationResearch activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey. 2009, 10:33 BMC Fam Practen
dc.identifier.issn1471-2296-
dc.identifier.pmid19432990-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2296-10-33-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/94738-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Despite increased investment in primary care research and development (R&D), the level of engagement of primary healthcare professionals with research remains poor. The aim of this study is to assess the level of research activity and capacity for research among primary healthcare professionals in a health authority of over one million people in a mixed urban/rural setting in the West of Ireland. METHODS: A questionnaire, incorporating the R+D Culture Index, was sent to primary healthcare professionals in the HSE Western Region. Baseline characteristics were analysed with the use of one-way ANOVA and Chi-square test and the dependence of R&D Culture Index score on all sixteen available covariates was examined using multiple regression and regression tree modelling. RESULTS: There was a 54% response rate to the questionnaire. Primary healthcare professionals appeared to have an interest in and awareness of the importance of research in primary care but just 15% were found to be research active in this study. A more positive attitude towards an R&D culture was associated with having had previous research training, being currently involved in research and with not being a general practitioner (GP) (p < 0.001), but much variability in the R&D culture index score remained unexplained. CONCLUSION: Despite awareness of the importance of R&D in primary care and investment therein, primary healthcare professionals remain largely unengaged with the R&D process. This study highlights the issues that need to be addressed in order to encourage a shift towards a culture of R&D in primary care: lack of research training particularly in basic research skills and increased opportunities for research involvement. The use of the R&D Culture Index may enable groups to be identified that may be more research interested and can therefore be targeted in any future R&D strategy.-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshAdult-
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Variance-
dc.subject.meshAttitude of Health Personnel-
dc.subject.meshData Collection-
dc.subject.meshEvidence-Based Medicine-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshHealth Personnel-
dc.subject.meshHealth Services Research-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.meshPrimary Health Care-
dc.subject.meshResearch-
dc.titleResearch activity and capacity in primary healthcare: the REACH study: a survey.en
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. liam.glynn@nuigalway.ieen
dc.identifier.journalBMC family practiceen
All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.