Cost-effectiveness of treatments reducing coronary heart disease mortality in Ireland, 2000 to 2010.
Authors
Bennett, KathleenKabir, Zubair
Barry, Michael
Tilson, Lesley
Fidan, Dogan
Shelley, Emer
Capewell, Simon
Affiliation
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. bennettk@tcd.ieIssue Date
2009-01
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Cost-effectiveness of treatments reducing coronary heart disease mortality in Ireland, 2000 to 2010. 2009, 12 (1):10-5notValue HealthJournal
Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes ResearchDOI
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00398.xPubMed ID
19040564Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is associated with a large burden of disease in Ireland and is responsible for more than 6000 deaths annually. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of specific CHD treatments in Ireland. METHODS: Irish epidemiological data on patient numbers and median survival in specific groups, plus the uptake, effectiveness, and costs of specific interventions, all stratified by age and sex, were incorporated into a previously validated CHD mortality model, the IMPACT model. This model calculates the number of life-years gained (LYGs) by specific cardiology interventions to generate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per LYG for each intervention. RESULTS: In 2000, medical and surgical treatments together prevented or postponed approximately 1885 CHD deaths in patients aged 25 to 84 years, and thus generated approximately 14,505 extra life-years (minimum 7270, maximum 22,475). In general, all the cardiac interventions investigated were highly cost-effective in the Irish setting. Aspirin, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, spironolactone, and warfarin for specific conditions were the most cost-effective interventions (< euro 3000/LYG), followed by the statins for secondary prevention (< euro 6500/LYG). Revascularization for chronic angina and primary angioplasty for myocardial infarction, although still cost-effective, had the highest ICER (between euro 12,000 and euro 20,000/LYG). CONCLUSIONS: Using a comprehensive standardized methodology, cost-effectiveness ratios in this study clearly favored simple medical treatments for myocardial infarction, secondary prevention, angina, and heart failure.Language
enISSN
1524-4733ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00398.x