A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/332945
Title:
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
Authors:
Ahmad, N Z; Racheva, G; Elmusharaf, H
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Letterkenny General Hospital, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland. nasirzahmad@gmail.com
Citation:
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. 2013, 15 (3):269-77 Colorectal Dis
Journal:
Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
Issue Date:
Mar-2013
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/332945
DOI:
10.1111/codi.12007
PubMed ID:
22958456
Abstract:
Evidence supporting the role of laparoscopy in abdominoperineal resection (APR) is limited. This study compared the short-term and long-term outcomes and complications associated with open and laparoscopic APR.
Item Type:
Article
Language:
en
MeSH:
Clinical Trials as Topic; Colectomy; Humans; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Rectal Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
ISSN:
1463-1318

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorAhmad, N Zen_GB
dc.contributor.authorRacheva, Gen_GB
dc.contributor.authorElmusharaf, Hen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-20T08:59:37Z-
dc.date.available2014-10-20T08:59:37Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-
dc.identifier.citationA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. 2013, 15 (3):269-77 Colorectal Disen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1463-1318-
dc.identifier.pmid22958456-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/codi.12007-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/332945-
dc.description.abstractEvidence supporting the role of laparoscopy in abdominoperineal resection (APR) is limited. This study compared the short-term and long-term outcomes and complications associated with open and laparoscopic APR.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Irelanden_GB
dc.subject.meshClinical Trials as Topic-
dc.subject.meshColectomy-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshLaparoscopy-
dc.subject.meshLaparotomy-
dc.subject.meshRectal Neoplasms-
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Surgery, Letterkenny General Hospital, Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland. nasirzahmad@gmail.comen_GB
dc.identifier.journalColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Irelanden_GB
dc.description.fundingNo fundingen
dc.description.provinceUlsteren
dc.description.peer-reviewpeer-reviewen

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.