Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system in Ireland: methods and response rates

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/322917
Title:
Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system in Ireland: methods and response rates
Authors:
O’Keeffe, Linda M.; Kearney, Patricia M.; Greene, Richard A.
Citation:
O'Keeffe LM, Kearney PM, Greene RA. Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system in Ireland: methods and response rates. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2014 June 10 [epub ahead of print]
Publisher:
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Journal:
Maternal and Child Health Journal
Issue Date:
Jun-2014
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/322917
DOI:
10.1007/s10995-014-1527-7
Additional Links:
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-014-1527-7
Abstract:
To describe response rates and characteristics associated with response to the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System study in Ireland (PRAMS Ireland). Using hospital discharge records of live births at a large, urban, obstetric hospital, a sampling frame of approximately 2,400 mother-infant pairs were used to alternately sample 1,200 women. Mothers’ information including name, address, parity, age and infant characteristics such as sex and gestational age at delivery were extracted from records. Modes of contact included an invitation letter with option to opt out of the study, three mail surveys, a reminder letter and text message reminder for remaining non-respondents. Sixty-one per cent of women responded to the PRAMS Ireland survey over a 133 day response period. Women aged <30, single women, multiparous women and women with a preterm delivery were less likely to respond. Women participating in PRAMS Ireland were similar to the national birth profile in 2011 which had a mean age of 32, were 40 % primiparous, 33 % single or never married and had a 28 % caesarean section rate. Survey and protocol changes are required to increase response rates above recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) thresholds of 65 % within the recommended 90 day data collection cycle. Additional efforts such as stratification and over-sampling are required to increase representativeness among hard to reach groups such as younger, single and multiparous women before expanding the project to an ongoing, national surveillance system in Ireland.
Item Type:
Article
Language:
en
Keywords:
PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT
ISSN:
1092-7875; 1573-6628

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorO’Keeffe, Linda M.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorKearney, Patricia M.en_GB
dc.contributor.authorGreene, Richard A.en_GB
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-15T11:51:31Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-15T11:51:31Z-
dc.date.issued2014-06-
dc.identifier.citationO'Keeffe LM, Kearney PM, Greene RA. Pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system in Ireland: methods and response rates. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2014 June 10 [epub ahead of print]en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1092-7875-
dc.identifier.issn1573-6628-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10995-014-1527-7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/322917-
dc.description.abstractTo describe response rates and characteristics associated with response to the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System study in Ireland (PRAMS Ireland). Using hospital discharge records of live births at a large, urban, obstetric hospital, a sampling frame of approximately 2,400 mother-infant pairs were used to alternately sample 1,200 women. Mothers’ information including name, address, parity, age and infant characteristics such as sex and gestational age at delivery were extracted from records. Modes of contact included an invitation letter with option to opt out of the study, three mail surveys, a reminder letter and text message reminder for remaining non-respondents. Sixty-one per cent of women responded to the PRAMS Ireland survey over a 133 day response period. Women aged <30, single women, multiparous women and women with a preterm delivery were less likely to respond. Women participating in PRAMS Ireland were similar to the national birth profile in 2011 which had a mean age of 32, were 40 % primiparous, 33 % single or never married and had a 28 % caesarean section rate. Survey and protocol changes are required to increase response rates above recommended Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) thresholds of 65 % within the recommended 90 day data collection cycle. Additional efforts such as stratification and over-sampling are required to increase representativeness among hard to reach groups such as younger, single and multiparous women before expanding the project to an ongoing, national surveillance system in Ireland.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMaternal and Child Health Journalen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10995-014-1527-7en_GB
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Maternal and Child Health Journalen_GB
dc.subjectPREGNANCYen_GB
dc.subjectRISK ASSESSMENTen_GB
dc.titlePregnancy risk assessment monitoring system in Ireland: methods and response ratesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.journalMaternal and Child Health Journalen_GB
dc.description.fundingNo fundingen
dc.description.provinceMunsteren
dc.description.peer-reviewpeer-reviewen
All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.