Whole-Body MRI versus PET in assessment of multiple myeloma disease activity.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/254735
Title:
Whole-Body MRI versus PET in assessment of multiple myeloma disease activity.
Authors:
Shortt, Conor P; Gleeson, Tadhg G; Breen, Karen A; McHugh, John; O'Connell, Martin J; O'Gorman, Peter J; Eustace, Stephen J
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Citation:
Whole-Body MRI versus PET in assessment of multiple myeloma disease activity. 2009, 192 (4):980-6 AJR Am J Roentgenol
Publisher:
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
Journal:
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
Issue Date:
Apr-2009
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/254735
DOI:
10.2214/AJR.08.1633
PubMed ID:
19304704
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to compare FDG PET; whole-body MRI; and the reference standard, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, to determine the best imaging technique for assessment of disease activity in multiple myeloma.
Item Type:
Article
Language:
en
MeSH:
Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biopsy; Female; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Positron-Emission Tomography; Predictive Value of Tests; Radiopharmaceuticals; Sensitivity and Specificity; Whole Body Imaging
ISSN:
1546-3141

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorShortt, Conor Pen_GB
dc.contributor.authorGleeson, Tadhg Gen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBreen, Karen Aen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMcHugh, Johnen_GB
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell, Martin Jen_GB
dc.contributor.authorO'Gorman, Peter Jen_GB
dc.contributor.authorEustace, Stephen Jen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-06T10:07:39Z-
dc.date.available2012-12-06T10:07:39Z-
dc.date.issued2009-04-
dc.identifier.citationWhole-Body MRI versus PET in assessment of multiple myeloma disease activity. 2009, 192 (4):980-6 AJR Am J Roentgenolen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1546-3141-
dc.identifier.pmid19304704-
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.08.1633-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/254735-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare FDG PET; whole-body MRI; and the reference standard, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, to determine the best imaging technique for assessment of disease activity in multiple myeloma.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherAJR. American journal of roentgenologyen_GB
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to AJR. American journal of roentgenologyen_GB
dc.subject.meshAdult-
dc.subject.meshAged-
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.meshBiopsy-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshFluorodeoxyglucose F18-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshMagnetic Resonance Imaging-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.meshMultiple Myeloma-
dc.subject.meshPositron-Emission Tomography-
dc.subject.meshPredictive Value of Tests-
dc.subject.meshRadiopharmaceuticals-
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.subject.meshWhole Body Imaging-
dc.titleWhole-Body MRI versus PET in assessment of multiple myeloma disease activity.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalAJR. American journal of roentgenologyen_GB
dc.description.provinceLeinsteren

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.