Suprapubic compared with transurethral bladder catheterization for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/251316
Title:
Suprapubic compared with transurethral bladder catheterization for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors:
Healy, Eibhlín F; Walsh, Colin A; Cotter, Amanda M; Walsh, Stewart R
Affiliation:
Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, and National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Citation:
Suprapubic compared with transurethral bladder catheterization for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2012, 120 (3):678-87 Obstet Gynecol
Journal:
Obstetrics and gynecology
Issue Date:
Sep-2012
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/251316
DOI:
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182657f0d
PubMed ID:
22914481
Abstract:
Suprapubic catheterization is commonly used for postoperative bladder drainage after gynecologic procedures. However, recent studies have suggested an increased rate of complications compared with urethral catheterization. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing suprapubic catheterization and urethral catheterization in gynecologic populations.
Item Type:
Article
Language:
en
MeSH:
Abdomen; Catheter-Related Infections; Cross Infection; Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Length of Stay; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Urethra; Urinary Catheterization; Urinary Tract Infections
ISSN:
1873-233X

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorHealy, Eibhlín Fen_GB
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Colin Aen_GB
dc.contributor.authorCotter, Amanda Men_GB
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Stewart Ren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-07T15:18:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-07T15:18:53Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-
dc.identifier.citationSuprapubic compared with transurethral bladder catheterization for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2012, 120 (3):678-87 Obstet Gynecolen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1873-233X-
dc.identifier.pmid22914481-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182657f0d-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/251316-
dc.description.abstractSuprapubic catheterization is commonly used for postoperative bladder drainage after gynecologic procedures. However, recent studies have suggested an increased rate of complications compared with urethral catheterization. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing suprapubic catheterization and urethral catheterization in gynecologic populations.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to Obstetrics and gynecologyen_GB
dc.subject.meshAbdomen-
dc.subject.meshCatheter-Related Infections-
dc.subject.meshCross Infection-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshGynecologic Surgical Procedures-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshLength of Stay-
dc.subject.meshPostoperative Care-
dc.subject.meshPostoperative Complications-
dc.subject.meshUrethra-
dc.subject.meshUrinary Catheterization-
dc.subject.meshUrinary Tract Infections-
dc.titleSuprapubic compared with transurethral bladder catheterization for gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, and National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalObstetrics and gynecologyen_GB
dc.description.provinceLeinsteren
All Items in Lenus,the Irish health repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.