Search:
Browse
Collection All
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
Listed communities
bullet
bullet
HSE
bullet
bullet
LIS
bullet
bullet
bullet

Irish Health Repository > Other Irish Health Organisations > Charitable & Advocacy Organisations > Milford Care Centre > Use of dependency and prioritization tools by clinical nurse specialists in palliative care: an exploratory study.

Files in This Item:
File Description Size Format View/Open
UseofdependencyprioritizationtoolsCNC.pdf203KbAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Title: Use of dependency and prioritization tools by clinical nurse specialists in palliative care: an exploratory study.
Authors: Bracken, Mairéad
McLoughlin, Kathleen
McGilloway, Sinéad
McMahon, Edith
Affiliation: National University of Ireland (NUI) Maynooth; Milford Care Centre
Citation: Use of dependency and prioritization tools by clinical nurse specialists in palliative care: an exploratory study. 2011, 17 (12):599-606 Int J Palliat Nurs
Journal: International journal of palliative nursing
Issue Date: Dec-2011
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10147/238566
PubMed ID: 22240742
Abstract: The principal aim was to assess the utility of three needs assessment/dependency tools for use in community-based palliative care services. Specific objectives were to assess a sample of patients receiving specialist palliative care community nursing using these tools, to assess the predictive ability of each tool, and to explore the utility of prioritizing and measuring patient dependency from a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) perspective.
In phase 1, 22 community-based CNSs completed the Vale prioritization tool for all patients visited during a 3-month period (n=162). They also completed either the Graves and Payne (2007) or the Birch et al (1997) dependency tool after each visit. In phase 2 a focus group (n=8) and two one-to-one interviews with CNS participants explored the perceived utility of all three tools.
The Vale prioritization tool appeared to be the most useful for prioritizing patient need and managing workload. Statistical analysis highlighted minimal differences between the two dependency tools, neither of which predicted length of visit. Three themes were identified from phase 2: difficulties with routine administration, points of divergence between the two dependency tools, and workload concerns.
While the Vale prioritization tool emerged as the most useful, the findings raise questions about the overall utility and practical application of these kinds of tools with community-based palliative care patients. Further research is needed to identify/develop, adapt, and evaluate appropriate, setting-specific dependency tools for use with this population.
Type: Article
Language: en
Description: AIMS: The principal aim was to assess the utility of three needs assessment/dependency tools for use in community-based palliative care services. Specific objectives were to assess a sample of patients receiving specialist palliative care community nursing using these tools, to assess the predictive ability of each tool, and to explore the utility of prioritizing and measuring patient dependency from a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) perspective. METHOD: In phase 1, 22 community-based CNSs completed the Vale prioritization tool for all patients visited during a 3-month period (n=162). They also completed either the Graves and Payne (2007) or the Birch et al (1997) dependency tool after each visit. In phase 2 a focus group (n=8) and two one-to-one interviews with CNS participants explored the perceived utility of all three tools. RESULTS: The Vale prioritization tool appeared to be the most useful for prioritizing patient need and managing workload. Statistical analysis highlighted minimal differences between the two dependency tools, neither of which predicted length of visit. Three themes were identified from phase 2: difficulties with routine administration, points of divergence between the two dependency tools, and workload concerns. CONCLUSION: While the Vale prioritization tool emerged as the most useful, the findings raise questions about the overall utility and practical application of these kinds of tools with community-based palliative care patients. Further research is needed to identify/develop, adapt, and evaluate appropriate, setting-specific dependency tools for use with this population.
Keywords: PALLIATIVE CARE
MeSH: Humans
Palliative Care
Specialties, Nursing
ISSN: 1357-6321
Appears in Collections: Milford Care Centre

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10147/238566
    Del.icio.us     LinkedIn     Citeulike     Connotea     Facebook     Stumble it!



Related articles on PubMed
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
bullet
See all 98 articles

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons

All Items in LENUS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.