Use of dependency and prioritization tools by clinical nurse specialists in palliative care: an exploratory study.

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/238566
Title:
Use of dependency and prioritization tools by clinical nurse specialists in palliative care: an exploratory study.
Authors:
Bracken, Mairéad; McLoughlin, Kathleen; McGilloway, Sinéad; McMahon, Edith
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland (NUI) Maynooth; Milford Care Centre
Citation:
Use of dependency and prioritization tools by clinical nurse specialists in palliative care: an exploratory study. 2011, 17 (12):599-606 Int J Palliat Nurs
Journal:
International journal of palliative nursing
Issue Date:
Dec-2011
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/238566
PubMed ID:
22240742
Abstract:
The principal aim was to assess the utility of three needs assessment/dependency tools for use in community-based palliative care services. Specific objectives were to assess a sample of patients receiving specialist palliative care community nursing using these tools, to assess the predictive ability of each tool, and to explore the utility of prioritizing and measuring patient dependency from a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) perspective.; In phase 1, 22 community-based CNSs completed the Vale prioritization tool for all patients visited during a 3-month period (n=162). They also completed either the Graves and Payne (2007) or the Birch et al (1997) dependency tool after each visit. In phase 2 a focus group (n=8) and two one-to-one interviews with CNS participants explored the perceived utility of all three tools.; The Vale prioritization tool appeared to be the most useful for prioritizing patient need and managing workload. Statistical analysis highlighted minimal differences between the two dependency tools, neither of which predicted length of visit. Three themes were identified from phase 2: difficulties with routine administration, points of divergence between the two dependency tools, and workload concerns.; While the Vale prioritization tool emerged as the most useful, the findings raise questions about the overall utility and practical application of these kinds of tools with community-based palliative care patients. Further research is needed to identify/develop, adapt, and evaluate appropriate, setting-specific dependency tools for use with this population.
Item Type:
Article
Language:
en
Description:
AIMS: The principal aim was to assess the utility of three needs assessment/dependency tools for use in community-based palliative care services. Specific objectives were to assess a sample of patients receiving specialist palliative care community nursing using these tools, to assess the predictive ability of each tool, and to explore the utility of prioritizing and measuring patient dependency from a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) perspective. METHOD: In phase 1, 22 community-based CNSs completed the Vale prioritization tool for all patients visited during a 3-month period (n=162). They also completed either the Graves and Payne (2007) or the Birch et al (1997) dependency tool after each visit. In phase 2 a focus group (n=8) and two one-to-one interviews with CNS participants explored the perceived utility of all three tools. RESULTS: The Vale prioritization tool appeared to be the most useful for prioritizing patient need and managing workload. Statistical analysis highlighted minimal differences between the two dependency tools, neither of which predicted length of visit. Three themes were identified from phase 2: difficulties with routine administration, points of divergence between the two dependency tools, and workload concerns. CONCLUSION: While the Vale prioritization tool emerged as the most useful, the findings raise questions about the overall utility and practical application of these kinds of tools with community-based palliative care patients. Further research is needed to identify/develop, adapt, and evaluate appropriate, setting-specific dependency tools for use with this population.
Keywords:
PALLIATIVE CARE
MeSH:
Humans; Palliative Care; Specialties, Nursing
ISSN:
1357-6321

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorBracken, Mairéaden_GB
dc.contributor.authorMcLoughlin, Kathleenen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMcGilloway, Sinéaden_GB
dc.contributor.authorMcMahon, Edithen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-14T15:49:43Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-14T15:49:43Z-
dc.date.issued2011-12-
dc.identifier.citationUse of dependency and prioritization tools by clinical nurse specialists in palliative care: an exploratory study. 2011, 17 (12):599-606 Int J Palliat Nursen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1357-6321-
dc.identifier.pmid22240742-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/238566-
dc.descriptionAIMS: The principal aim was to assess the utility of three needs assessment/dependency tools for use in community-based palliative care services. Specific objectives were to assess a sample of patients receiving specialist palliative care community nursing using these tools, to assess the predictive ability of each tool, and to explore the utility of prioritizing and measuring patient dependency from a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) perspective. METHOD: In phase 1, 22 community-based CNSs completed the Vale prioritization tool for all patients visited during a 3-month period (n=162). They also completed either the Graves and Payne (2007) or the Birch et al (1997) dependency tool after each visit. In phase 2 a focus group (n=8) and two one-to-one interviews with CNS participants explored the perceived utility of all three tools. RESULTS: The Vale prioritization tool appeared to be the most useful for prioritizing patient need and managing workload. Statistical analysis highlighted minimal differences between the two dependency tools, neither of which predicted length of visit. Three themes were identified from phase 2: difficulties with routine administration, points of divergence between the two dependency tools, and workload concerns. CONCLUSION: While the Vale prioritization tool emerged as the most useful, the findings raise questions about the overall utility and practical application of these kinds of tools with community-based palliative care patients. Further research is needed to identify/develop, adapt, and evaluate appropriate, setting-specific dependency tools for use with this population.en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe principal aim was to assess the utility of three needs assessment/dependency tools for use in community-based palliative care services. Specific objectives were to assess a sample of patients receiving specialist palliative care community nursing using these tools, to assess the predictive ability of each tool, and to explore the utility of prioritizing and measuring patient dependency from a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) perspective.-
dc.description.abstractIn phase 1, 22 community-based CNSs completed the Vale prioritization tool for all patients visited during a 3-month period (n=162). They also completed either the Graves and Payne (2007) or the Birch et al (1997) dependency tool after each visit. In phase 2 a focus group (n=8) and two one-to-one interviews with CNS participants explored the perceived utility of all three tools.-
dc.description.abstractThe Vale prioritization tool appeared to be the most useful for prioritizing patient need and managing workload. Statistical analysis highlighted minimal differences between the two dependency tools, neither of which predicted length of visit. Three themes were identified from phase 2: difficulties with routine administration, points of divergence between the two dependency tools, and workload concerns.-
dc.description.abstractWhile the Vale prioritization tool emerged as the most useful, the findings raise questions about the overall utility and practical application of these kinds of tools with community-based palliative care patients. Further research is needed to identify/develop, adapt, and evaluate appropriate, setting-specific dependency tools for use with this population.-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to International journal of palliative nursingen_GB
dc.subjectPALLIATIVE CAREen_GB
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshPalliative Care-
dc.subject.meshSpecialties, Nursing-
dc.titleUse of dependency and prioritization tools by clinical nurse specialists in palliative care: an exploratory study.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentNational University of Ireland (NUI) Maynooth; Milford Care Centreen_GB
dc.identifier.journalInternational journal of palliative nursingen_GB
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Creative Commons
All Items in Lenus,the Irish health repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.