Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/228073
Title:
Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.
Authors:
Martin, S T; Heneghan, H M; Winter, D C
Affiliation:
Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. drseanmartin@gmail.com
Citation:
Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. 2012, 99 (5):603-12 Br J Surg
Journal:
The British journal of surgery
Issue Date:
May-2012
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/228073
DOI:
10.1002/bjs.8677
PubMed ID:
22246846
Abstract:
For a select group of patients proctectomy with intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer may be a viable alternative to abdominoperineal resection, with good oncological outcomes while preserving sphincter function. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality, and functional outcomes after ISR for low rectal cancer.
Item Type:
Article
Language:
en
MeSH:
Aged; Anal Canal; Female; Humans; Male; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Organ Sparing Treatments; Postoperative Complications; Rectal Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
ISSN:
1365-2168

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorMartin, S Ten_GB
dc.contributor.authorHeneghan, H Men_GB
dc.contributor.authorWinter, D Cen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-08T14:55:40Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-08T14:55:40Z-
dc.date.issued2012-05-
dc.identifier.citationSystematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. 2012, 99 (5):603-12 Br J Surgen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1365-2168-
dc.identifier.pmid22246846-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bjs.8677-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/228073-
dc.description.abstractFor a select group of patients proctectomy with intersphincteric resection (ISR) for low rectal cancer may be a viable alternative to abdominoperineal resection, with good oncological outcomes while preserving sphincter function. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the current evidence regarding oncological outcomes, morbidity and mortality, and functional outcomes after ISR for low rectal cancer.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsArchived with thanks to The British journal of surgeryen_GB
dc.subject.meshAged-
dc.subject.meshAnal Canal-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm Recurrence, Local-
dc.subject.meshOrgan Sparing Treatments-
dc.subject.meshPostoperative Complications-
dc.subject.meshRectal Neoplasms-
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleSystematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. drseanmartin@gmail.comen_GB
dc.identifier.journalThe British journal of surgeryen_GB
dc.description.provinceLeinsteren
All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.