Who benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/207272
Title:
Who benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study.
Authors:
Campbell, Kikuko; Bond, Gary R; Drake, Robert E
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont, Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. kiyamamo@iupui.edu
Citation:
Schizophr Bull. 2011 Mar;37(2):370-80. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
Journal:
Schizophrenia bulletin
Issue Date:
1-Feb-2012
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/207272
DOI:
10.1093/schbul/sbp066
PubMed ID:
19661196
Abstract:
AIMS: This meta-analysis sought to identify which subgroups of clients with severe mental illness (SMI) benefited from evidence-based supported employment. METHODS: We used meta-analysis to pool the samples from 4 randomized controlled trials comparing the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment to well-regarded vocational approaches using stepwise models and brokered services. Meta-analysis was used to determine the magnitude of effects for IPS/control group differences within specific client subgroups (defined by 2 work history, 7 sociodemographic, and 8 clinical variables) on 3 competitive employment outcomes (obtaining a job, total weeks worked, and job tenure). RESULTS: The findings strongly favored IPS, with large effect sizes across all outcomes: 0.96 for job acquisition, 0.79 for total weeks worked, and 0.74 for job tenure. Overall, 90 (77%) of the 117 effect sizes calculated for the 39 subgroups exceeded 0.70, and all 117 favored IPS. CONCLUSIONS: IPS produces better competitive employment outcomes for persons with SMI than alternative vocational programs regardless of background demographic, clinical, and employment characteristics.
Language:
eng
MeSH:
Adult; *Employment, Supported; Evidence-Based Practice; Female; Humans; Income; Male; Middle Aged; Motivation; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; *Rehabilitation, Vocational; Schizophrenia/*rehabilitation; *Schizophrenic Psychology
ISSN:
1745-1701 (Electronic); 0586-7614 (Linking)

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Kikukoen_GB
dc.contributor.authorBond, Gary Ren_GB
dc.contributor.authorDrake, Robert Een_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-01T10:03:42Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-01T10:03:42Z-
dc.date.issued2012-02-01T10:03:42Z-
dc.identifier.citationSchizophr Bull. 2011 Mar;37(2):370-80. Epub 2009 Aug 6.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1745-1701 (Electronic)en_GB
dc.identifier.issn0586-7614 (Linking)en_GB
dc.identifier.pmid19661196en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/schbul/sbp066en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/207272-
dc.description.abstractAIMS: This meta-analysis sought to identify which subgroups of clients with severe mental illness (SMI) benefited from evidence-based supported employment. METHODS: We used meta-analysis to pool the samples from 4 randomized controlled trials comparing the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of supported employment to well-regarded vocational approaches using stepwise models and brokered services. Meta-analysis was used to determine the magnitude of effects for IPS/control group differences within specific client subgroups (defined by 2 work history, 7 sociodemographic, and 8 clinical variables) on 3 competitive employment outcomes (obtaining a job, total weeks worked, and job tenure). RESULTS: The findings strongly favored IPS, with large effect sizes across all outcomes: 0.96 for job acquisition, 0.79 for total weeks worked, and 0.74 for job tenure. Overall, 90 (77%) of the 117 effect sizes calculated for the 39 subgroups exceeded 0.70, and all 117 favored IPS. CONCLUSIONS: IPS produces better competitive employment outcomes for persons with SMI than alternative vocational programs regardless of background demographic, clinical, and employment characteristics.en_GB
dc.language.isoengen_GB
dc.subject.meshAdulten_GB
dc.subject.mesh*Employment, Supporteden_GB
dc.subject.meshEvidence-Based Practiceen_GB
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_GB
dc.subject.meshHumansen_GB
dc.subject.meshIncomeen_GB
dc.subject.meshMaleen_GB
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_GB
dc.subject.meshMotivationen_GB
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicen_GB
dc.subject.mesh*Rehabilitation, Vocationalen_GB
dc.subject.meshSchizophrenia/*rehabilitationen_GB
dc.subject.mesh*Schizophrenic Psychologyen_GB
dc.titleWho benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study.en_GB
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont, Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. kiyamamo@iupui.eduen_GB
dc.identifier.journalSchizophrenia bulletinen_GB
dc.description.provinceLeinster-

Related articles on PubMed

All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.