Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/206245
Title:
Banked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.
Authors:
Dempsey, Eugene; Miletin, Jan
Affiliation:
Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Citation:
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD007644.
Journal:
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online)
Issue Date:
31-Jan-2012
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/206245
DOI:
10.1002/14651858.CD007644.pub2
PubMed ID:
20556782
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Human milk banking has been available in many countries for the last three decades. The milk provided from milk banking is predominantly term breast milk, but some milk banks provide preterm breast milk. There are a number of differences between donor term and donor preterm human milk. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of banked preterm milk compared with banked term milk regarding growth and developmental outcome in very low birth weight infants (infants weighing less than 1500 g). SEARCH STRATEGY: We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, including a search of the Cochrane Neonatal Group specialized register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, January 2010). We searched the computerised bibliographic databases MEDLINE (1966 to February 2010), EMBASE (1988 to February 2010) and Web of Science (1975 to February 2010). We searched reference lists of all selected articles, review articles and the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials. We also searched abstracts from neonatal and pediatric meetings (PAS electronic version from 2000 to 2009, ESPR hand search from 2000 to 2009). We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing banked donor preterm milk with banked donor term milk regarding growth and developmental outcomes in very low birth weight infants DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We planned to perform assessment of methodology regarding blinding of randomisation, intervention and outcome measurements as well as completeness of follow-up. We planned to evaluate treatment effect using a fixed-effect model using relative risk (RR), relative risk reduction, risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) for categorical data and using mean, standard deviation and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data. We planned an evaluation of heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: No studies met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are no randomised trials that compare preterm banked milk to banked term milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.
Language:
eng
MeSH:
*Child Development; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight/*growth & development; *Milk Banks; *Milk, Human/chemistry
ISSN:
1469-493X (Electronic); 1361-6137 (Linking)

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorDempsey, Eugeneen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMiletin, Janen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-31T16:43:39Z-
dc.date.available2012-01-31T16:43:39Z-
dc.date.issued2012-01-31T16:43:39Z-
dc.identifier.citationCochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD007644.en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1469-493X (Electronic)en_GB
dc.identifier.issn1361-6137 (Linking)en_GB
dc.identifier.pmid20556782en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/14651858.CD007644.pub2en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/206245-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Human milk banking has been available in many countries for the last three decades. The milk provided from milk banking is predominantly term breast milk, but some milk banks provide preterm breast milk. There are a number of differences between donor term and donor preterm human milk. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of banked preterm milk compared with banked term milk regarding growth and developmental outcome in very low birth weight infants (infants weighing less than 1500 g). SEARCH STRATEGY: We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group, including a search of the Cochrane Neonatal Group specialized register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, January 2010). We searched the computerised bibliographic databases MEDLINE (1966 to February 2010), EMBASE (1988 to February 2010) and Web of Science (1975 to February 2010). We searched reference lists of all selected articles, review articles and the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials. We also searched abstracts from neonatal and pediatric meetings (PAS electronic version from 2000 to 2009, ESPR hand search from 2000 to 2009). We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing banked donor preterm milk with banked donor term milk regarding growth and developmental outcomes in very low birth weight infants DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We planned to perform assessment of methodology regarding blinding of randomisation, intervention and outcome measurements as well as completeness of follow-up. We planned to evaluate treatment effect using a fixed-effect model using relative risk (RR), relative risk reduction, risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) for categorical data and using mean, standard deviation and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data. We planned an evaluation of heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: No studies met the inclusion criteria. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There are no randomised trials that compare preterm banked milk to banked term milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.en_GB
dc.language.isoengen_GB
dc.subject.mesh*Child Developmenten_GB
dc.subject.meshHumansen_GB
dc.subject.meshInfant, Newbornen_GB
dc.subject.meshInfant, Very Low Birth Weight/*growth & developmenten_GB
dc.subject.mesh*Milk Banksen_GB
dc.subject.mesh*Milk, Human/chemistryen_GB
dc.titleBanked preterm versus banked term human milk to promote growth and development in very low birth weight infants.en_GB
dc.contributor.departmentNeonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalCochrane database of systematic reviews (Online)en_GB
dc.description.provinceMunster-
All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.