Comparison of three cuffed emergency percutaneous cricothyroidotomy devices to conventional surgical cricothyroidotomy in a porcine model.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/127647
Title:
Comparison of three cuffed emergency percutaneous cricothyroidotomy devices to conventional surgical cricothyroidotomy in a porcine model.
Authors:
Murphy, C; Rooney, S J; Maharaj, C H; Laffey, J G; Harte, B H
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.
Citation:
Comparison of three cuffed emergency percutaneous cricothyroidotomy devices to conventional surgical cricothyroidotomy in a porcine model. 2011, 106 (1):57-64 Br J Anaesth
Journal:
British journal of anaesthesia
Issue Date:
Jan-2011
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/127647
DOI:
10.1093/bja/aeq294
PubMed ID:
21037267
Abstract:
Emergency cricothyroidotomy is a potentially life-saving procedure in the 'cannot intubate cannot ventilate (CICV)' scenario. Although surgical cricothyroidotomy remains the technique recommended in many 'CICV' algorithms, the insertion of a tracheostomy as a cannula over a trocar, or using the Seldinger method, may have advantages as they are more familiar to the anaesthetist. We compared the utility of three cuffed cricothyroidotomy devices: cuffed Melker®, Quicktrach 2®, and PCK® devices, with surgical cricothyroidotomy.; After ethical committee approval and written informed consent, 20 anaesthetists performed cricothyroidotomy with all four devices in random order, in a pig larynx and trachea model covered in cured pelt. The primary endpoints were the rate of successful placement of the cricothyroidotomy device into the trachea and the duration of the insertion attempt.; The Melker® and Quicktrach 2® devices possessed advantages over the surgical approach, in contrast to the PCK® device, which performed less well. All 20 participants inserted the Melker®, with 19 being successful using the surgical approach and the Quicktrach 2®, whereas only 12 successfully inserted the PCK® device (PCK® vs surgical, P=0.02). The Quicktrach 2® had the fastest insertion times and caused least trauma to the posterior tracheal wall. The Melker® was rated highest by the participants and was the only device rated higher than the surgical technique.; The Melker® and Quicktrach 2® devices appear to hold particular promise as alternatives to surgical cricothyroidotomy. Further studies, in more clinically relevant models, are required to confirm these initial positive findings.
Item Type:
Article
Language:
en
MeSH:
Animals; Cricoid Cartilage; Emergencies; Equipment Design; Models, Animal; Respiration, Artificial; Sus scrofa; Thyroid Cartilage; Tracheostomy
ISSN:
1471-6771

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Cen
dc.contributor.authorRooney, S Jen
dc.contributor.authorMaharaj, C Hen
dc.contributor.authorLaffey, J Gen
dc.contributor.authorHarte, B Hen
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-07T09:05:05Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-07T09:05:05Z-
dc.date.issued2011-01-
dc.identifier.citationComparison of three cuffed emergency percutaneous cricothyroidotomy devices to conventional surgical cricothyroidotomy in a porcine model. 2011, 106 (1):57-64 Br J Anaesthen
dc.identifier.issn1471-6771-
dc.identifier.pmid21037267-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bja/aeq294-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/127647-
dc.description.abstractEmergency cricothyroidotomy is a potentially life-saving procedure in the 'cannot intubate cannot ventilate (CICV)' scenario. Although surgical cricothyroidotomy remains the technique recommended in many 'CICV' algorithms, the insertion of a tracheostomy as a cannula over a trocar, or using the Seldinger method, may have advantages as they are more familiar to the anaesthetist. We compared the utility of three cuffed cricothyroidotomy devices: cuffed Melker®, Quicktrach 2®, and PCK® devices, with surgical cricothyroidotomy.-
dc.description.abstractAfter ethical committee approval and written informed consent, 20 anaesthetists performed cricothyroidotomy with all four devices in random order, in a pig larynx and trachea model covered in cured pelt. The primary endpoints were the rate of successful placement of the cricothyroidotomy device into the trachea and the duration of the insertion attempt.-
dc.description.abstractThe Melker® and Quicktrach 2® devices possessed advantages over the surgical approach, in contrast to the PCK® device, which performed less well. All 20 participants inserted the Melker®, with 19 being successful using the surgical approach and the Quicktrach 2®, whereas only 12 successfully inserted the PCK® device (PCK® vs surgical, P=0.02). The Quicktrach 2® had the fastest insertion times and caused least trauma to the posterior tracheal wall. The Melker® was rated highest by the participants and was the only device rated higher than the surgical technique.-
dc.description.abstractThe Melker® and Quicktrach 2® devices appear to hold particular promise as alternatives to surgical cricothyroidotomy. Further studies, in more clinically relevant models, are required to confirm these initial positive findings.-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshAnimals-
dc.subject.meshCricoid Cartilage-
dc.subject.meshEmergencies-
dc.subject.meshEquipment Design-
dc.subject.meshModels, Animal-
dc.subject.meshRespiration, Artificial-
dc.subject.meshSus scrofa-
dc.subject.meshThyroid Cartilage-
dc.subject.meshTracheostomy-
dc.titleComparison of three cuffed emergency percutaneous cricothyroidotomy devices to conventional surgical cricothyroidotomy in a porcine model.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Anaesthesia, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland.en
dc.identifier.journalBritish journal of anaesthesiaen
dc.description.provinceConnacht-
All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.