Extubation versus tracheostomy in withdrawal of treatment-ethical, clinical, and legal perspectives.

Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/127210
Title:
Extubation versus tracheostomy in withdrawal of treatment-ethical, clinical, and legal perspectives.
Authors:
Chotirmall, Sanjay Haresh; Flynn, Maura G; Donegan, Ciaran F; Smith, David; O'Neill, Shane J; McElvaney, Noel Gerard
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine - Respiratory Research Division, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Education & Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Republic of Ireland. schotirmall@rcsi.ie
Citation:
Extubation versus tracheostomy in withdrawal of treatment-ethical, clinical, and legal perspectives. 2010, 25 (2):360.e1-8 J Crit Care
Journal:
Journal of critical care
Issue Date:
Jun-2010
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/10147/127210
DOI:
10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.08.007
PubMed ID:
19850443
Abstract:
The provision of life-sustaining ventilation, such as tracheostomy to critically ill patients, is commonly performed. However, the utilization of tracheostomy or extubation after a withdrawal of treatment decision is debated. There is a dearth of practical information available to aid clinical decision making because withdrawal of treatment is a challenging scenario for all concerned. This is further complicated by medicolegal and ethical considerations. Care of the "hopelessly ill" patient should be based on daily evaluation and comfort making it impossible to fit into general algorithms. Although respect for autonomy is important in healthcare, it is limited for patients in an unconscious state. Beneficence remains the basis for withdrawing treatment in futile cases and underpins the "doctrine of double effect." This article presents a relevant clinical case of hypoxic brain injury where a question of withdrawal of treatment arose and examines the ethical, clinical, and medicolegal considerations inherent in such cases, including beneficence, nonmaleficence, and the "sanctity of life doctrine." In addition, the considerations of prognosis for recovery, patient autonomy, patient quality of life, and patient family involvement, which are central to decision making, are addressed. The varying legal frameworks that exist internationally regarding treatment withdrawal are also described. Good ethics needs sound facts, and despite the lack of legal foundation in several countries, withdrawal of treatment remains practiced, and the principles described within this article aim to aid clinician decision making during such complex and multifaceted end-of-life decisions.
Item Type:
Article
Language:
en
MeSH:
Adult; Beneficence; Critical Care; Decision Making; Great Britain; Humans; Hypoxia, Brain; Intubation, Intratracheal; Male; Personal Autonomy; Professional-Family Relations; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Tracheostomy; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment
ISSN:
1557-8615

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorChotirmall, Sanjay Hareshen
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Maura Gen
dc.contributor.authorDonegan, Ciaran Fen
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Daviden
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, Shane Jen
dc.contributor.authorMcElvaney, Noel Gerarden
dc.date.accessioned2011-04-05T14:50:54Z-
dc.date.available2011-04-05T14:50:54Z-
dc.date.issued2010-06-
dc.identifier.citationExtubation versus tracheostomy in withdrawal of treatment-ethical, clinical, and legal perspectives. 2010, 25 (2):360.e1-8 J Crit Careen
dc.identifier.issn1557-8615-
dc.identifier.pmid19850443-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.08.007-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10147/127210-
dc.description.abstractThe provision of life-sustaining ventilation, such as tracheostomy to critically ill patients, is commonly performed. However, the utilization of tracheostomy or extubation after a withdrawal of treatment decision is debated. There is a dearth of practical information available to aid clinical decision making because withdrawal of treatment is a challenging scenario for all concerned. This is further complicated by medicolegal and ethical considerations. Care of the "hopelessly ill" patient should be based on daily evaluation and comfort making it impossible to fit into general algorithms. Although respect for autonomy is important in healthcare, it is limited for patients in an unconscious state. Beneficence remains the basis for withdrawing treatment in futile cases and underpins the "doctrine of double effect." This article presents a relevant clinical case of hypoxic brain injury where a question of withdrawal of treatment arose and examines the ethical, clinical, and medicolegal considerations inherent in such cases, including beneficence, nonmaleficence, and the "sanctity of life doctrine." In addition, the considerations of prognosis for recovery, patient autonomy, patient quality of life, and patient family involvement, which are central to decision making, are addressed. The varying legal frameworks that exist internationally regarding treatment withdrawal are also described. Good ethics needs sound facts, and despite the lack of legal foundation in several countries, withdrawal of treatment remains practiced, and the principles described within this article aim to aid clinician decision making during such complex and multifaceted end-of-life decisions.-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.meshAdult-
dc.subject.meshBeneficence-
dc.subject.meshCritical Care-
dc.subject.meshDecision Making-
dc.subject.meshGreat Britain-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshHypoxia, Brain-
dc.subject.meshIntubation, Intratracheal-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshPersonal Autonomy-
dc.subject.meshProfessional-Family Relations-
dc.subject.meshPrognosis-
dc.subject.meshQuality of Life-
dc.subject.meshTracheostomy-
dc.subject.meshValue of Life-
dc.subject.meshWithholding Treatment-
dc.titleExtubation versus tracheostomy in withdrawal of treatment-ethical, clinical, and legal perspectives.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Medicine - Respiratory Research Division, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Education & Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Republic of Ireland. schotirmall@rcsi.ieen
dc.identifier.journalJournal of critical careen
dc.description.provinceLeinster-
All Items in Lenus, The Irish Health Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.