<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LENUS Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/244211</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-06-20T07:42:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Annual Report 2011</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/274572</link>
      <description>Title: Annual Report 2011
Authors: The Drug Treatment Centre Board (DTCB)</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10147/274572</guid>
      <dc:date>2011-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Drug use prevention: an overview of research</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/248719</link>
      <description>Title: Drug use prevention: an overview of research
Authors: Morgan, Mark
Description: This is the first Report to be published by the National Advisory Committee on Drugs which was&#xD;
established in 2000. The role of the Committee is to advise the Government in relation to the prevalence,&#xD;
prevention, treatment and consequences of problem drug use and I am delighted that the Committee's&#xD;
first Report looks at the important area of prevention and the effectiveness of various programmes and&#xD;
initiatives that have been undertaken.&#xD;
We are all too aware of the havoc that drug misuse continues to wreak on the lives of individuals, families&#xD;
and communities. As the Report points out there is no single drug problem - instead there are a variety of&#xD;
different problems each of which requires a somewhat different approach. The Report also found that&#xD;
problem drug use is particularly likely where other factors involving social and educational disadvantage&#xD;
and deprivation are involved.&#xD;
The new National Drugs Strategy 2001 - 2008, which was launched by the Government in May 2001, is&#xD;
built around the four pillars of supply reduction, prevention, treatment and research. A number of the 100&#xD;
actions in the Strategy relate to the area of prevention and this Report is, therefore, both timely and&#xD;
thought-provoking as we start to implement these actions.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10147/248719</guid>
      <dc:date>2001-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reports of side effects associated with the use of drugs 1987-1988</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/244356</link>
      <description>Title: Reports of side effects associated with the use of drugs 1987-1988
Authors: National Drugs Advisory Board (NDAB)
Description: During 1987 the National Drugs Advisory Board received 1,288 reports concerning patients&#xD;
who experienced adverse reactions associated with the use of medicines. From these reports 2,251&#xD;
side effects were recorded.&#xD;
Thirty-five percent of the reports were forwarded by general pract1t1oners, 21% by&#xD;
pharmacists (about half of those were received from pharmacists conducting special surveys, one in&#xD;
the Drug Information Centre. St. James's Hospital. and the other from a special research project.)&#xD;
Hospital Consultants were the source of 15% of the reports while the Board's intensive&#xD;
monitoring scheme provided 16% Pharmaceutical Companies' reports accounted for 10%. One&#xD;
percent of the reports came from dentists.&#xD;
Deaths Associated with Drugs&#xD;
Twenty-one deaths were recorded as associated with ingestion of medicines. In s1x of these&#xD;
cases the medications were not regarded as implicated aetiologically while two resulted from&#xD;
overdosage (one of Paracetamol). In five other cases, drugs ingestion could possibly have contributed&#xD;
to death primarily due to major pathology.&#xD;
Of the eight remaining deaths two occurred with NSAID, one after a mass1ve gastrointestinal&#xD;
haemorrhage and one following severe diarrhoea with consequent electrolyte imbalance - both patients&#xD;
were over 75 years of age. One occurred with induction of anaesthesia, one followed the unexpected&#xD;
development of malignant neuroleptic syndrome, one followed complete heart block consequent to the&#xD;
use of an antiarrhythmic, one was consequent on renal failure produced in a patient on captopril with&#xD;
thrombosis of a single renal artery.&#xD;
An interaction between warfarin and miconazole led to a prolonged prothrombin time and&#xD;
extensive cerebellar haemorrhage in a patient. Another interaction between a phenothiazine and a&#xD;
tricyclic antidepressant led to epileptiform seizures and death.&#xD;
Fourteen interactions were reported during 1987. In 5 the effect was additive &#xD;
pharmacodynamic reaction, 2 with CNS depression, 1 with hypokalaemia, 1 negative inotropism, and 1&#xD;
an anticoagulant effect.&#xD;
Additive toxicity was noted in 6 cases, gastrointestinal damage in 1, CNS confusion in 1 and&#xD;
tyramine reactions in 4.&#xD;
Pharmacokinetic interactions were responsible in 3 cases, 2 a displacement from protein&#xD;
binding and 1 from inhibition of hepatic microsomal enzymes.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 1988 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10147/244356</guid>
      <dc:date>1988-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reports of side effects associated with the use of drugs 1985</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/244354</link>
      <description>Title: Reports of side effects associated with the use of drugs 1985
Authors: National Drugs Advisory Board (NDAB)
Description: Halothane&#xD;
In the ten year period of 1970 to 1980 the Board received 9 reports of hepatitis (2 fatal) associated with the repeated&#xD;
use of halothane. This mirrors experience in other countries. Although the mechanism of action is not as yet generally&#xD;
accepted, the role of allergenicity is considered highly significant. It is recommended that where ever possible&#xD;
administration of halothane should not be repeated at less than 3 monthly Intervals.&#xD;
A second potential source of risk from halothane lies in its cardiodepressant action, a tendency to bradycardia, and to&#xD;
arrhythmias which may lead to particular problems when the anaesthetic is administered to patients maintained on&#xD;
beta-adrenoceptor blockade. It Is essential that anaesthetists be aware of medications used on patients coming&#xD;
under their cam so that appropriate precaution can be taken.&#xD;
2. Carbamazepine&#xD;
This drug Is being used more frequently in the management not only of epilepsy but for other conditions. It is useful&#xD;
therefore to review the types of side effects for which clinicians need to be on the alert. The most Important of these&#xD;
concern the central nervous system with incoordination, drowsiness and ataxia, hypersensitivity reactions affecting&#xD;
skin, liver, blood and lung particularly, and those apparently directly related to plasma levels of carbamazepine such&#xD;
as the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone.&#xD;
3. Glutethimide&#xD;
This drug was withdrawn from the market in 1983. As has been reported in other countries its use has been associated&#xD;
with cases of dependence.&#xD;
4. Phenothiazineu&#xD;
The Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome characterised by hyperthermia, semi coma to coma, muscular rigidity and&#xD;
autonomic disorders is generally recognised as being most frequently associated with the high potency anti psychotic&#xD;
drugs such as chlorpromazine, flupenthixol and trifluoperazine. It is less commonly known that a similar adverse&#xD;
effect can develop with prolonged antihistamine therapy especially with the phenothiazines, but also with some of the&#xD;
other antihistamines. Recovery is delayed with those drugs having a long half life or presented as a dep6t preparation.&#xD;
The reaction can be particularly severe in the young.&#xD;
5. Benzodiazepines&#xD;
It is again noteworthy that central nervous system irritability manifested as confusion, bizzare behaviour, nightmares,&#xD;
hallucinations, aggression, and occasionally withdrawal syndrome, etc. occurs In some individuals in association&#xD;
with drugs of this group particularly those with a short half-life, when used over prolonged periods, in association with&#xD;
other centrally active drugs, or in the elderly.&#xD;
It is important tl1at use of benzodiazepines should be limited to short periods of 4 to 6 weeks or less, whether the drug&#xD;
is intended for Insomnia or anxiety, kept to as low a dose as possible if given concomitantly with other central nervous&#xD;
system drugs, and used at minimal levels for the elderly.&#xD;
6. Midazolam&#xD;
This short acting benzodiazepine has been available for about 18 months as a parenterally administered anaesthetic&#xD;
for short duration minor procedures. Particular care is required in its rate of administration and in the selection of&#xD;
patients for its use since It has a significant propensity for cardiorespiratory functional depression</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 1985 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10147/244354</guid>
      <dc:date>1985-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

