<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LENUS Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/240751</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2013-05-25T03:26:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Medical Research Council report for the year ended 31st December 1975</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/241031</link>
      <description>Title: Medical Research Council report for the year ended 31st December 1975
Authors: Medical Research Council of Ireland
Description: Some years ago the Medical Research Council examined the trends in&#xD;
research projects it supported. A wide disparity between clinical and&#xD;
laboratory based projects was observed. The Council moved to redress&#xD;
the imbalance and achieved a significant increase in clinical research.&#xD;
Currently the two biomedical approaches are exactly on a par with one&#xD;
another, as assessed by the crude estimate of the number of grants apportioned&#xD;
to each. It is time again to re-examine the distribution of research&#xD;
support within the two areas and to evaluate the effective coverage in each.&#xD;
In clinical research the bulk of the support is channelled into internal&#xD;
medicine and its sub-disciplines. Nearly 40% of the grant budget is so&#xD;
expended; most of the awards go to support cardiovascular, gastroenterologica1,&#xD;
haematological and metabolic studies. The small balance&#xD;
of clinical support remaining is apportioned about equally between&#xD;
surgical and paediatric investigations. Notable gaps are evident. In&#xD;
neuropsychiatry, obstetrics, gynaecology, neurology, neurosurgery, clinical&#xD;
oncology and medical genetics the Council's support is rarely requested.&#xD;
All represent spheres of intense biomedical activity with problems germane&#xD;
to public health and susceptible to solution by appropriately&#xD;
subsidised research. Such subsidy, if required, should correctly be derived&#xD;
from an expansion of the budget.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1975 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10147/241031</guid>
      <dc:date>1975-12-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Medical Research Council of Ireland annual report for the year ended 31st December 1974</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/241011</link>
      <description>Title: Medical Research Council of Ireland annual report for the year ended 31st December 1974
Authors: Medical Research Council of Ireland
Description: The considerable support of medical scientists has required the Council&#xD;
to take an interest in their training. In lieu of formal training programmes&#xD;
such as exist in other countries, a quasi-apprentice arrangement has&#xD;
prevailed. Many grants include provision for a graduate assistant who&#xD;
obtains a variable measure of training under supervision of the grant&#xD;
holder. Other young scientists may obtain fellowships at a stage of their&#xD;
career when training is incomplete; informal association with colleagues&#xD;
in their institution replaces supervised training to some extent. Neither&#xD;
suffices as substitute for an essential training program necessary for the&#xD;
proper training of man-power required for effective biomedical research.&#xD;
Both suffer the defect of premature diversion of trainees into whole time&#xD;
research which tends to narrow activity and stultify future adaptability to&#xD;
changes in research. There is a real danger of the young scientist being&#xD;
locked into the machinery of a powerful and limiting research effort.&#xD;
The decision to continue support of scientists in training under research&#xD;
grants requires that the budget should include a training grant in order&#xD;
to assure a sustained level of training and also evidence that an adequate&#xD;
training program is available in the department. Otherwise the cost of the&#xD;
training is at the expense of the on-going research and results in no net&#xD;
saving of grant funds. The Council has been re-evaluating the merits of&#xD;
training grants in the light of such factors, and considering the proportion&#xD;
of assistant grants which properly belong in that category.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 1974 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10147/241011</guid>
      <dc:date>1974-12-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Medical Research Council of Ireland annual report for the year ended 31st December 1978</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/240992</link>
      <description>Title: Medical Research Council of Ireland annual report for the year ended 31st December 1978
Authors: Medical Research Council of Ireland
Description: The Medical Research Council. is primarily&#xD;
concerned with the excellence and veracity of investigative programmes.&#xD;
The role of medical research is one which is frequently raised by the&#xD;
lay person. It is a commonly stated opinion that medical research is&#xD;
really a function of developed and rich societies in which poorer societies,&#xD;
like our own, should not become involved. Reference, in fact, to our&#xD;
deficiency of research experience was made in the foreword to the last&#xD;
annual report of the Council, with particular reference to the failure of&#xD;
Irish scientists to contribute to our fullest capability and capacity to the&#xD;
solution of European orientated research projects.&#xD;
It is very important to remember that medical research has many roles&#xD;
in addition to the important role of solving specific medical problems.&#xD;
It enables us to foster in our community an enthusiasm for clinical and&#xD;
basic investigation, and also to foster a more critical and analytical&#xD;
approach to current clinical practising procedures. There is no doubt&#xD;
but that the practice of medicine in those areas in which there is an active&#xD;
research orientation has a level of excellence which is an example to&#xD;
the community and an ideal to which young graduates aspire.&#xD;
Promotion of medical research enables us to be associated with scientific&#xD;
investigations going on in other countries and thus very importantly&#xD;
enables us to apply the results of such investigations to our community&#xD;
as soon as such knowledge becomes available. Indeed the needs of the&#xD;
community for medical research are perhaps not adequately appreciated.&#xD;
As mentioned in the foreword of last year's report, the Council hopes&#xD;
to establish special research unit projects which will be particularly related&#xD;
to our local needs, and the selection of criteria for the choice of such&#xD;
research priorities occupied a considerable percentage of the Council's&#xD;
time during the year. The future aspirations of the Medical Research&#xD;
Council involve therefore not only the continued support of research&#xD;
projects as in previous years, but also the promotion of research into&#xD;
areas which the Council consider would be of particular value to the&#xD;
Irish community either in terms of primary health care or of the particular&#xD;
facilities and expertise available.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 1978 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10147/240992</guid>
      <dc:date>1978-12-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Medical Research Council of Ireland annual report for the year ended 31st December 1977</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10147/240991</link>
      <description>Title: Medical Research Council of Ireland annual report for the year ended 31st December 1977
Authors: Medical Research Council of Ireland
Description: The Council is fully aware of a considerable medical research potential&#xD;
in our community and of the frustrations aroused by its ineffective&#xD;
expression. As a granting agency it is limited by its slender appropriation&#xD;
in several ways. Most significantly it cannot fruitfully anticipate emerging&#xD;
trends worthy of development or concentrate on objectives with special&#xD;
relevance to the disease patterns in our community (both activities are&#xD;
reliable means for profitable utilisation of available research talent). At&#xD;
best the Council must depend on investigator-initiated projects to achieve&#xD;
its objectives by allowing some measure of priority to such projects. In&#xD;
the context of our terms of reference this is highly unsatisfactory, because&#xD;
it requires displacement of support rather than the appropriate development&#xD;
and expansion needed to meet the contingencies of new research.&#xD;
In several fields of research, including Cancer Research and Cardiovascular&#xD;
Research, voluntary organisations have to some extent ameliorated&#xD;
the difficulty. They too are faced with the identical problems. With&#xD;
these considerations uppermost the Council has sought means by which&#xD;
it could redress the balance and assure more effective contribution from&#xD;
the research potential. In this regard the role of the Medical Research&#xD;
Council was broadly discussed in June by the Council's officers with&#xD;
officials of the Department of Health. An important topic concerned the&#xD;
programme presented to the Minister by the Council in 1974, which&#xD;
referred to establishment of an Institute, setting up of research units&#xD;
and to more comprehensively designed research projects. These might&#xD;
be of national interest and relate to problems which require more than&#xD;
three years of study. While these proposals have been under consideration&#xD;
since 1974 the Council has continued to discharge its responsibilities&#xD;
as best it can under financial stress and within obsolescent guidelines.&#xD;
Pressures on its policies have evolved mainly from mounting demands&#xD;
on its resources by investigator-initiated research projects. Currently the&#xD;
Council cannot financially satisfy all requests submitted to it by many&#xD;
acceptable applicants whom it considers worthy of support. Some, which&#xD;
had been highly recommended by the special Committees, have had to&#xD;
be rejected. This situation is likely to introduce an unhealthy spirit of&#xD;
competition for its finances between scientists (and their institutions),&#xD;
which must be detrimental to research, especially that initiated by&#xD;
competent young investigators. So far the Council has managed to&#xD;
avoid this by a peer review system whereby the special Committees&#xD;
conduct interviews with all new applicants. The solution is obvious, to&#xD;
increase the grant as indicated by the Council to the Minister. This&#xD;
necessary expenditure would comprise a miniscule of our GNP and&#xD;
still leave the support of Medical Research in Ireland the lowest among&#xD;
the nations of the European Community, including those of comparable&#xD;
population. It should be recalled that the Council's grant at present&#xD;
represents 1 part in I ,400 of the GNP (0.07 %).</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 1977 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10147/240991</guid>
      <dc:date>1977-12-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

